IN Калининском районном суде Санкт-Петербурга прошло первое открытое заседание по существу у обвиняемой в «фейках об армии» INиктории Петровой
The meeting opened with a standard ban on filming during the meeting.
Прокурор выступила с длинным текстом обвинения, обосновывая ложность 4 постав INиктории со 2 марта по 3 апреля о войне, в частности, ратификацией договоров о дружбе между РФ и ЛДНР, а также тем, что экспертом в военном деле подсудимая не является.
The judge reproached the prosecutor that she should not have read the accusation word for word, but state it.
INиктория в ответ заявила, что вину не признаёт и из предъявленного ей понятно не всё. Петрова считает, что статью 207.3 УК нужно декриминализовать, так как по ней «без разбора гребут людей, просто потому что они против войны». Она назвала войну с Украиной чудовищной ошибкой и сказала, что нужно немедленно вывести войска с территории страны.
INиктория отметила, что предъявленное обвинение — полный абсурд и мотив её определён неправильно, к военным она неприязни не испытывает, напротив, пыталась их спасать, обращаясь к высшим чинам с призывом остановить войну, и хотела, чтобы военнослужащие не исполняли преступные приказы.
(Note that today it became known that Petrova’s cellmates were forced to write a denunciation against her, allegedly because of the continuation of anti-war agitation.)
When the girl moved on to comparing what Ukraine is being saved from, and cited UN figures that 7 people died in Ukraine in 2021, and hundreds of thousands died in 2022, the judge urged Petrova to return to the charge.
— IN ситуации боевых действий антивоенный протест – обязанность гражданина, а не преступление, — завершила INиктория свою речь.
The hall burst into applause, the judge ordered that all the clappers leave the hall.
Lawyer Anastasia Pilipenko began her speech with an objection about the audience, noting that a remark was enough.
Further, the defense lawyer explained that the accused has the right to know what he is accused of, and the wording from the prosecution does not allow him to understand this, as well as the court to pass a fair sentence.
By itself, the article on “fakes” undermines ideological diversity and it is not clear from its disposition what kind of information can be judged for the dissemination,” the lawyer continued, “and this makes it possible to apply to the Constitutional Court.
Anastasia noted that, according to the Criminal Code, motives can be either based on political hatred or in relation to a social group, but not all of them together, and the prosecutor previously announced that the composition contains discredit – and this is an administrative non-arrest article.
In addition, lawyer Pilipenko drew attention to the fact that the girl was charged with publishing the post before the article appeared, and according to the law, the act is completed at the time of publication.
Violations in the aggregate do not provide an opportunity for a quality defense, as well as for a guilty verdict, lawyer Anastasia Pilipenko concluded her speech.
At this meeting, it was decided to postpone for 12 hours on December 12.
SOTA (@sotaproject)